« My latest geek addiction... | Main | Say, has anyone seen my assault rifle? »
I dig it, baby!
Posted by vicarious on August 5, 2007 09:50 PM | Permalink
Yeah, I've been watching pdd transform before my eyes this evening. Nice new look you've got developing here.
Posted by: ironic1 | August 5, 2007 09:54 PM
All the blackness, skulls, stonehenge...
It was all looking so bleak and unfriendly. I just couldn't stand it.
No solid game plan here. Just playing around.
Posted by: Barrett | August 5, 2007 09:59 PM
Hmm... Barrett... your blog is all new happy colors, too... hmm... could it be a new Barrett?
Posted by: tamara | August 5, 2007 10:03 PM
Nope. Just establishing a false sense of security.
Posted by: Barrett | August 5, 2007 10:57 PM
Seismic, man
Posted by: The Candidate | August 6, 2007 01:29 AM
sweet as sugar and twice as bad for your teeth.
nice!
Posted by: zra... | August 6, 2007 06:26 AM
fun with style sheets .. do some crazy dhtml with layers .
Posted by: baci | August 6, 2007 07:50 AM
A recent article on Slashdot suggests that maybe black backgrounds are better?
"Recent commentary at Nature Climate Change describes an on-going debate about the energy savings associated with the background colors used by high-traffic websites such as Google and the NYTimes. A back of the envelope calculation has suggested energy savings of 750 Megawatt hours per year if Google switched their background from white to black. In response, a new version of Google called Blackle was created. However, other calculations by the Wall Street Journal suggest minimal energy savings."
Posted by: Bill | August 6, 2007 11:37 AM
WSJ is pwnd by FOX.
Posted by: adam | August 6, 2007 01:17 PM
Honestly, I kinda liked the dark red/black site. The white looks a bit to stark.
Posted by: Bad Cat! | August 6, 2007 01:45 PM
Different. Fresh. Sterile. I prefer the dark.
Posted by: heysme | August 6, 2007 02:04 PM
White kind of makes it look like everything else I'm forced to look at online. I prefer the dark.
Posted by: adam | August 6, 2007 02:52 PM
FORCED to look at?
Who's forcing you to be online?
Posted by: vicarious | August 6, 2007 03:47 PM
The Internet.
Posted by: adam | August 6, 2007 03:57 PM
Goddamn Internet and It's inexhaustible choice of colors.
Posted by: vicarious | August 6, 2007 04:57 PM
according to scholars the background color of the universe is #fff8e7.
I prefer #250eae
Posted by: hexabacicemil | August 6, 2007 06:26 PM
I like the white.
Posted by: The Cheerleader | August 6, 2007 10:01 PM
I like Pantone 180
Posted by: skud | August 7, 2007 08:11 AM
Process or solid? Solid looks like greasy dog poo.
Posted by: adam | August 7, 2007 05:38 PM
Name:
Email Address: (Required) (Will NOT be published)
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)
Type the letters "PDD" in the box below. (required):
Seriously: If you click "post" more than once, you're going to end up looking really stupid.
If you don't see your comment after it's published, try refreshing your browser.
Comments
Yeah, I've been watching pdd transform before my eyes this evening. Nice new look you've got developing here.
Posted by: ironic1 | August 5, 2007 09:54 PM
All the blackness, skulls, stonehenge...
It was all looking so bleak and unfriendly. I just couldn't stand it.
No solid game plan here. Just playing around.
Posted by: Barrett | August 5, 2007 09:59 PM
Hmm... Barrett... your blog is all new happy colors, too... hmm... could it be a new Barrett?
Posted by: tamara | August 5, 2007 10:03 PM
Nope. Just establishing a false sense of security.
Posted by: Barrett | August 5, 2007 10:57 PM
Seismic, man
Posted by: The Candidate | August 6, 2007 01:29 AM
sweet as sugar and twice as bad for your teeth.
nice!
Posted by: zra... | August 6, 2007 06:26 AM
fun with style sheets .. do some crazy dhtml with layers .
Posted by: baci | August 6, 2007 07:50 AM
A recent article on Slashdot suggests that maybe black backgrounds are better?
"Recent commentary at Nature Climate Change describes an on-going debate about the energy savings associated with the background colors used by high-traffic websites such as Google and the NYTimes. A back of the envelope calculation has suggested energy savings of 750 Megawatt hours per year if Google switched their background from white to black. In response, a new version of Google called Blackle was created. However, other calculations by the Wall Street Journal suggest minimal energy savings."
Posted by: Bill | August 6, 2007 11:37 AM
WSJ is pwnd by FOX.
Posted by: adam | August 6, 2007 01:17 PM
Honestly, I kinda liked the dark red/black site. The white looks a bit to stark.
Posted by: Bad Cat! | August 6, 2007 01:45 PM
Different. Fresh. Sterile. I prefer the dark.
Posted by: heysme | August 6, 2007 02:04 PM
White kind of makes it look like everything else I'm forced to look at online. I prefer the dark.
Posted by: adam | August 6, 2007 02:52 PM
FORCED to look at?
Who's forcing you to be online?
Posted by: vicarious | August 6, 2007 03:47 PM
The Internet.
Posted by: adam | August 6, 2007 03:57 PM
Goddamn Internet and It's inexhaustible choice of colors.
Posted by: vicarious | August 6, 2007 04:57 PM
according to scholars the background color of the universe is #fff8e7.
I prefer #250eae
Posted by: hexabacicemil | August 6, 2007 06:26 PM
I like the white.
Posted by: The Cheerleader | August 6, 2007 10:01 PM
I like Pantone 180
Posted by: skud | August 7, 2007 08:11 AM
Process or solid? Solid looks like greasy dog poo.
Posted by: adam | August 7, 2007 05:38 PM